Density of hosts per /24 prefix and as a percentage of the space within each prefix which has been advertised in BGP. Robin Whittle 21 February 2007 Full details are below the main table. http://www.firstpr.com.au/ip/ Be sure to see the graphic representation of addresses per /8, and what proportion are allocated and advertised, allocatedd and not advertised, or reserved, at: http://completewhois.com/bogons/data/data-bgp-announced/ipv4-activeblocks-statistics.txt Prefix Acks % ack Number of Host density as a from rate /24 prefixes percentage of 17820 advertised advertised IP pings in BGP addresses 000, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Sep81 IANA - Reserved 001, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Sep81 IANA - Reserved 002, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Sep81 IANA - Reserved 003, 0, 0 , 65536, 0 ,May94 General Electric Company 004, 100, 0.5787, 65536, 0 ,Dec92 Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc. 005, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Jul95 IANA - Reserved 006, 3, 0.0174, 1924, 0.59 ,Feb94 Army Information Systems Center 007, 0, 0 , 1, 0 ,Apr95 IANA - Reserved 008, 22, 0.1273, 65536, 0.13 ,Dec92 Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc. 009, 63, 0.3646, 257, 92.97 ,Aug92 IBM 010, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Jun95 IANA - Private Use [RFC1918] 011, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,May93 DoD Intel Information Systems 012, 523, 3.0266, 65536, 3.03 ,Jun95 AT&T Bell Laboratories 013, 0, 0 , 2828, 0 ,Sep91 Xerox Corporation 014, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Jun91 IANA - Public Data Network 015, 0, 0 , 65536, 0 ,Jul94 Hewlett-Packard Company 016, 0, 0 , 65536, 0 ,Nov94 Digital Equipment Corporation 017, 1, 0.0058, 65536, 0.01 ,Jul92 Apple Computer Inc. 018, 21, 0.1215, 65536, 0.12 ,Jan94 MIT 019, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,May95 Ford Motor Company 020, 0, 0 , 17619, 0 ,Oct94 Computer Sciences Corporation 021, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Jul91 DDN-RVN 022, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,May93 Defense Information Systems Agency 023, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Jul95 IANA - Reserved 024, 2719, 15.7350, 58541, 17.62 ,May01 ARIN - Cable Block 025, 0, 0 , 257, 0 ,Jan95 UK Ministry of Defense Updated 06 026, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,May95 Defense Information Systems Agency 027, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Apr95 IANA - Reserved 028, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Jul92 DSI-North 029, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Jul91 Defense Information Systems Agency 030, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Jul91 Defense Information Systems Agency 031, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Apr99 IANA - Reserved 032, 7, 0.0405, 65536, 0.04 ,Jun94 Norsk Informasjonsteknology 033, 1, 0.0058, 65536, 0.01 ,Jan91 DLA Systems Automation Center 034, 0, 0 , 304, 0 ,Mar93 Halliburton Company 035, 12, 0.0694, 65536, 0.07 ,Apr94 MERIT Computer Network 036, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Jul00 IANA - Reserved Was Stanford 037, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Apr95 IANA - Reserved 038, 67, 0.3877, 65536, 0.39 ,Sep94 Performance Systems International 039, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Apr95 IANA - Reserved 040, 0, 0 , 13206, 0 ,Jun94 Eli Lily and Company 041, 91, 0.5266, 7607, 4.54 ,Apr05 AfriNIC 042, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Jul95 IANA - Reserved 043, 015, 0.0868, 4096, 1.39 ,Jan91 Japan Inet 044, 0, 0 , 65536, 0 ,Jul92 Amateur Radio Digital Communicat 045, 0, 0 , 65536, 0 ,Jan95 Interop Show Network 046, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Dec92 Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc. 047, 0, 0 , 14401, 0 ,Jan91 Bell-Northern Research 048, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,May95 Prudential Securities Inc. 049, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,May94 Joint Technical Command} Returned to 050, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,May94 Joint Technical Command} IANA Mar 98 051, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Aug94 Deparment of Social Security of 052, 0, 0 , 199, 0 ,Dec91 E.I. duPont de Nemours and Co., 053, 0, 0 , 65536, 0 ,Oct93 Cap Debis CCS 054, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Mar92 Merck and Co., Inc. 055, 0, 0 , 65536, 0 ,Apr95 Boeing Computer Services 056, 0, 0 , 179, 0 ,Jun94 U.S. Postal Service 057, 3, 0.0174, 65536, 0.02 ,May95 SITA 058, 1642, 9.5023, 61738, 10.09 ,Apr04 APNIC 059, 1524, 8.8194, 46873, 12.33 ,Apr04 APNIC 060, 1367, 7.9109, 64533, 8.03 ,Apr03 APNIC 061, 1686, 9.7569, 64270, 9.95 ,Apr97 APNIC 062, 1226, 7.0949, 60555, 7.68 ,Apr97 RIPE NCC 063, 729, 4.2188, 63731, 4.34 ,Apr97 ARIN 064, 1793, 10.3762, 59454, 11.44 ,Jul99 ARIN 065, 1751, 10.1331, 62473, 10.63 ,Jul00 ARIN 066, 2348, 13.5880, 62467, 14.26 ,Jul00 ARIN 067, 1767, 10.2257, 46828, 14.31 ,May01 ARIN 068, 3258, 18.8542, 64816, 19.06 ,Jun01 ARIN 069, 3084, 17.8472, 57832, 20.22 ,Aug02 ARIN 070, 3485, 20.1678, 63088, 20.95 ,Jan04 ARIN 071, 5984, 34.6296, 62325, 36.41 ,Aug04 ARIN 072, 3582, 20.7292, 58678, 23.15 ,Aug04 ARIN 073, 1637, 9.4734, 57737, 10.75 ,Mar05 ARIN 074, 2987, 17.2859, 49341, 22.96 ,Jun05 ARIN 075, 2020, 11.6898, 46475, 16.48 ,Jun05 ARIN 076, 884, 5.1157, 31273, 10.72 ,Jun05 ARIN 077, 355, 2.0544, 41909, 3.21 ,Aug06 RIPE NCC 078, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Aug06 RIPE NCC 079, 85, 0.4919, 264, 122.11 ,Aug06 RIPE NCC 080, 2020, 11.6898, 61549, 12.45 ,Apr01 RIPE NCC 081, 2062, 11.9329, 61500, 12.72 ,Apr01 RIPE NCC 082, 1938, 11.2153, 63724, 11.53 ,Nov02 RIPE NCC 083, 2870, 16.6088, 63535, 17.13 ,Nov03 RIPE NCC 084, 2957, 17.1123, 63847, 17.56 ,Nov03 RIPE NCC 085, 1884, 10.9028, 60031, 11.9 ,Apr04 RIPE NCC 086, 1439, 8.3275, 55160, 9.89 ,Apr04 RIPE NCC 087, 1742, 10.0810, 61303, 10.78 ,Apr04 RIPE NCC 088, 2058, 11.9097, 59899, 13.03 ,Apr04 RIPE NCC 089, 1455, 8.4201, 57466, 9.60 ,Jun05 RIPE NCC 090, 843, 4.8785, 37256, 8.58 ,Jun05 RIPE NCC 091, 342, 1.9792, 42856, 3.03 ,Jun05 RIPE NCC 092, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Sep81 IANA - Reserved 093, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Sep81 IANA - Reserved 094, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Sep81 IANA - Reserved 095, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Sep81 IANA - Reserved 096, 1, 0.0058, 368, 1.03 ,Oct06 ARIN 097, 0, 0 , 1, 0 ,Oct06 ARIN 098, 0, 0 , 448, 0 ,Oct06 ARIN 099, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Oct06 ARIN 100, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Sep81 IANA - Reserved 101, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Sep81 IANA - Reserved 102, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Sep81 IANA - Reserved 103, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Sep81 IANA - Reserved 104, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Sep81 IANA - Reserved 105, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Sep81 IANA - Reserved 106, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Sep81 IANA - Reserved 107, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Sep81 IANA - Reserved 108, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Sep81 IANA - Reserved 109, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Sep81 IANA - Reserved 110, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Sep81 IANA - Reserved 111, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Sep81 IANA - Reserved 112, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Sep81 IANA - Reserved 113, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Sep81 IANA - Reserved 114, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Sep81 IANA - Reserved 115, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Sep81 IANA - Reserved 116, 0, 0 , 265, 0 ,Jan07 APNIC 117, 0, 0 , 265, 0 ,Jan07 APNIC 118, 0, 0 , 265, 0 ,Jan07 APNIC 119, 0, 0 , 265, 0 ,Jan07 APNIC 120, 0, 0 , 265, 0 ,Jan07 APNIC 121, 788, 4.5602, 54648, 5.47 ,Jan06 APNIC 122, 572, 3.3102, 42720, 5.08 ,Jan06 APNIC 123, 76, 0.4398, 28737, 1.00 ,Jan06 APNIC 124, 1308, 7.5694, 51755, 9.58 ,Jan05 APNIC 125, 1919, 11.1053, 62788, 11.59 ,Jan05 APNIC 126, 59, 0.3414, 10240, 2.18 ,Jan05 APNIC 127, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Sep81 IANA - Localhost 128, 550, 3.1829, 48500, 4.30 ,May93 Various Registries 129, 315, 1.8229, 47774, 2.50 ,May93 Various Registries 130, 290, 1.6782, 45707, 2.41 ,May93 Various Registries 131, 154, 0.8912, 50604, 1.15 ,May93 Various Registries 132, 265, 1.5336, 58064, 1.73 ,May93 Various Registries 133, 55, 0.3183, 37459, 0.56 ,May93 Various Registries 134, 252, 1.4583, 45014, 2.12 ,May93 Various Registries 135, 3, 0.0174, 25494, 0.04 ,May93 Various Registries 136, 25, 0.1447, 20040, 0.47 ,May93 Various Registries 137, 151, 0.8738, 46597, 1.23 ,May93 Various Registries 138, 81, 0.4688, 40164, 0.76 ,May93 Various Registries 139, 110, 0.6366, 31643, 1.32 ,May93 Various Registries 140, 141, 0.8160, 36860, 1.45 ,May93 Various Registries 141, 357, 2.0660, 47558, 2.85 ,May93 Various Registries 142, 172, 0.9954, 33254, 1.96 ,May93 Various Registries 143, 54, 0.3125, 42514, 0.48 ,May93 Various Registries 144, 80, 0.4630, 38111, 0.80 ,May93 Various Registries 145, 48, 0.2778, 47598, 0.38 ,May93 Various Registries 146, 124, 0.7176, 36428, 1.29 ,May93 Various Registries 147, 105, 0.6076, 42220, 0.94 ,May93 Various Registries 148, 79, 0.4572, 33249, 0.90 ,May93 Various Registries 149, 49, 0.2836, 44877, 0.41 ,May93 Various Registries 150, 77, 0.4456, 35118, 0.83 ,May93 Various Registries 151, 346, 2.0023, 41130, 3.19 ,May93 Various Registries 152, 129, 0.7465, 40292, 1.21 ,May93 Various Registries 153, 8, 0.0463, 11812, 0.26 ,May93 Various Registries 154, 32, 0.1852, 14400, 0.84 ,May93 Various Registries 155, 61, 0.3530, 40722, 0.57 ,May93 Various Registries 156, 56, 0.3241, 17101, 1.24 ,May93 Various Registries 157, 70, 0.4051, 35796, 0.74 ,May93 Various Registries 158, 77, 0.4456, 39224, 0.74 ,May93 Various Registries 159, 41, 0.2373, 32081, 0.48 ,May93 Various Registries 160, 67, 0.3877, 34129, 0.74 ,May93 Various Registries 161, 53, 0.3067, 30430, 0.66 ,May93 Various Registries 162, 92, 0.5324, 18960, 1.84 ,May93 Various Registries 163, 95, 0.5498, 33416, 1.08 ,May93 Various Registries 164, 98, 0.5671, 33538, 1.11 ,May93 Various Registries 165, 96, 0.5556, 32753, 1.11 ,May93 Various Registries 166, 99, 0.5729, 34900, 1.08 ,May93 Various Registries 167, 46, 0.2662, 30115, 0.58 ,May93 Various Registries 168, 142, 0.8218, 42218, 1.28 ,May93 Various Registries 169, 42, 0.2431, 16084, 0.99 ,May93 Various Registries 170, 34, 0.1968, 30649, 0.42 ,May93 Various Registries 171, 25, 0.1447, 5433, 1.75 ,May93 Various Registries 172, 570, 3.2986, 22785, 9.49 ,May93 Various Registries 173, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Apr03 IANA - Reserved 174, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Apr03 IANA - Reserved 175, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Apr03 IANA - Reserved 176, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Apr03 IANA - Reserved 177, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Apr03 IANA - Reserved 178, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Apr03 IANA - Reserved 179, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Apr03 IANA - Reserved 180, 0, 0 , 256, 0 ,Apr03 IANA - Reserved 181, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Apr03 IANA - Reserved 182, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Apr03 IANA - Reserved 183, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Apr03 IANA - Reserved 184, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Apr03 IANA - Reserved 185, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Apr03 IANA - Reserved 186, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Apr03 IANA - Reserved 187, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,Apr03 IANA - Reserved 188, 0, 0 , 256, 0 ,May93 Various Registries 189, 1073, 6.2095, 21918, 18.57 ,Jun05 LACNIC 190, 357, 2.0660, 14655, 9.24 ,Jun05 LACNIC 191, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,May93 Various Registries 192, 124, 0.7176, 22052, 2.13 ,May93 Various Registries 193, 528, 3.0556, 50843, 3.94 ,May93 RIPE NCC 194, 448, 2.5926, 52961, 3.21 ,May93 RIPE NCC 195, 731, 4.2303, 60410, 4.59 ,May93 RIPE NCC 196, 202, 1.1690, 13543, 5.66 ,May93 Various Registries 197, 0, 0 , 0, 0 ,May93 IANA - Reserved 198, 231, 1.3368, 36114, 2.43 ,May93 Various Registries 199, 189, 1.0938, 34049, 2.11 ,May93 ARIN 200, 1089, 6.3021, 57923, 7.13 ,Nov02 LACNIC 201, 1329, 7.6910, 51910, 9.71 ,Apr03 LACNIC 202, 818, 4.7338, 53148, 5.84 ,May93 APNIC 203, 932, 5.3935, 55167, 6.41 ,May93 APNIC 204, 323, 1.8692, 45880, 2.67 ,Mar94 ARIN 205, 251, 1.4525, 41012, 2.32 ,Mar94 ARIN 206, 410, 2.3727, 55319, 2.81 ,Apr95 ARIN 207, 807, 4.6701, 57260, 5.35 ,Nov95 ARIN 208, 632, 3.6574, 56211, 4.26 ,Apr96 ARIN 209, 1136, 6.5741, 57780, 7.46 ,Jun96 ARIN 210, 955, 5.5266, 61672, 5.87 ,Jun96 APNIC 211, 1527, 8.8368, 63272, 9.15 ,Jun96 APNIC 212, 1045, 6.0475, 59578, 6.65 ,Oct97 RIPE NCC 213, 1248, 7.2222, 59723, 7.93 ,Mar99 RIPE NCC 214, 0, 0 , 65536, 0 ,Mar98 US-DOD 215, 0, 0 , 32768, 0 ,Mar98 US-DOD 216, 1671, 9.6701, 60454, 10.48 ,Apr98 ARIN 217, 1544, 8.9352, 62673, 9.34 ,Jun00 RIPE NCC 218, 2297, 13.2928, 64446, 13.52 ,Dec00 APNIC 219, 2382, 13.7847, 65003, 13.90 ,Sep01 APNIC 220, 2334, 13.5069, 61651, 14.36 ,Dec01 APNIC 221, 2179, 12.6100, 65153, 12.68 ,Jul02 APNIC 222, 1951, 11.2905, 64849, 11.41 ,Feb03 APNIC 223, 0, 0 , 64849, 0 ,Apr03 IANA - Reserved The above provide the approximate host density per /8 prefix in IPv4 and the number of /24 prefixes advertised in each /8. "Advertised in BGP" means the network operator is accepting packets to the prefix and presumably allowing traffic out. The latter figure is from: http://completewhois.com/bogons/data/data-bgp-announced/ipv4-activeblocks-statistics.txt # Statistical data on percentage of actively used ip space for all /8 blocks # The totals below are based on data collected on Tue Feb 20 06:14:13 PST 2007 0/8: announced in bgp 0 /24 blocks (0%), not in bgp 65536 /24 blocks (100%) 1/8: announced in bgp 0 /24 blocks (0%), not in bgp 65536 /24 blocks (100%) 2/8: announced in bgp 0 /24 blocks (0%), not in bgp 65536 /24 blocks (100%) 3/8: announced in bgp 65536 /24 blocks (100%), not in bgp 0 /24 blocks (0%) 4/8: announced in bgp 65536 /24 blocks (100%), not in bgp 0 /24 blocks (0%) 5/8: announced in bgp 0 /24 blocks (0%), not in bgp 65536 /24 blocks (100%) 6/8: announced in bgp 1924 /24 blocks (2%), not in bgp 63612 /24 blocks (97%) 7/8: announced in bgp 1 /24 blocks (0%), not in bgp 65535 /24 blocks (99%) etc. which is about the time I collected the host density data. To estimate the host density (the proportion of IP addresses which respond to a ping packet, indicating there is a computer, router or whatever actually using that IP address at the time of the test) I used two programs I wrote: ping-scanner-5sec.c ping-scanner-call-multiple.c The first one is an approximately 5 second version of ping-scanner.c. This is instructed on its command line to ping random addresses within a particular /8 prefix "ppp", for a certain number of pings "nnnnn". It then writes a file ppp.txt reporting on one line, ppp, the number of responses received, and the percentage of the pings sent which this represents. I ran the second program to instantiate 223 of these programs, each sending one ping for every 5 seconds, for about 24 hours. For reasons unknown, some of the instances finished an hour or two earlier. However I am happy that this represents a good 24 hour sampling during weekdays. The results were consistent with a series of shorter 1000 ping tests 50 prefixes at once, one ping per prefix per second, the day before. So over about 24 hours each /8 was sent 17280 ping packets, with the command: ping-scanner-call-multiple 1 223 17280 Each /8 has 16,777,216 IP addresses, so for a day, I pinged one in every 970.903 IP addresses on the Net. This tests presence of a host (a computer, a router etc.) at each IP address. This technique cannot count every computer with Internet access, since it does not see computers in private networks, including those in home and office networks behind a NAT firewall, as is implemented by virtually all ADSL and HFC Cable modems. It would count each active ADSL or cable modem service as one host since the ADSL router or cable modem would respond to the ping. I think this technique would usually count an ADSL router or cable modem which was connected and turned on, even if there were no computers attached to it. I spread the test over 24 hours to try to smooth out timezones and people turning their computers off. This was over a lightly loaded ADSL link (Internode with a Telstra DSLAM) with 36.8 k bytes/sec upstream and 380 k bytes/sec downstream. I have no reason to beleive ping or response packets were lost on the local link, the gatway computer or the P4 Celeron machine which ran the ping-scanner instances. Finishing times, all on 21 February 2007, Melbourne Australia daylight savings time, are at the end of this file. I started them at 11.48 AM the day before, but each successive instance was launched after a 7 second delay, so the starting times were scattered. The local (Debian 3.1 stable) ping program would not try to ping the 0.0.0.0/9 prefix. A Park-Miller-Carta pseudorandom number genertor: http://www.firstpr.com.au/dsp/rand31/ seeded from the local time and the prefix number, was used to generate random octets for bits 32 to 0 of the ping address: ppp.xxx.xxx.xxx One would not expect responses from all IP addresses even in a fully populated network, since there would be no hosts on network boundaries. These boundaries could be anywhere, but would probably include xxx.xxx.xxx.0 and xxx.xxx.xxx.255. The column 2 and 3 data below has been manually edited to: 1 - Add an entry for 0.0.0.0/8, with zero results. 2 - Change the results for the localhost prefix to zero - since actual results were 100% of pings acknowledged. I used Code-Genie to do the fancy column selection, deletion, copy and paste operations etc. to bring the columns of data together, and to extract them from the original completewhois.com file. I saved this as analysis-2.csv file and opened it with OpenOffice Calc. From this I found: Total percentages from my host-density figures = 635.04% Total /24s allocated = 6566456 Divide by 65536 = total size of advertised /24s expressed in units of a /8 = 100.196 Multiply by 2^24 to get the number of IP addresses this represents = 1681012736 = 1.681 billion Average host density for all advertised address space - since we know pings are not acknowledged from space which is not advertised. For instance, if 100% of IP addresses responded to pings, my percentages would add to 10019%. 635.04% / 100.19 = 6.337% Total number of hosts found on Internet, assuming these figures can be extrapolated to a full sample. 1.681 billion * 0.06337 = 106525777 = 106.5 million (Sanity check - I received 109734 acks and I figure I pinged one in every 970.903 IP addresses. 970.903 * 109734 = 106541147.) What I really want to know is the host density in the advertised space in each /8 prefix, because I think some of them which were allocated to single organisations in the early 1990s are not used much - or at all. For instance, I didn't get a single ping acknowledgement from 3.0.0.0/8, which was assigned to General Electric. For this I used the Calc spreadsheet to produce column 5. This is the percentage of acks I got for the prefix, multiplied by the number of /24s which the prefix spans (65535) divided by the number of advertised /24s in that prefix. (I selected the column of results and copied, pasting the numbers to Code-Genie.) One prefix produced an anomalous result of above 100%. I am not sure why 79.0.0.0/8 with only 264 /8s advertised acknowledged more than its fair share of pings, but perhaps it was sampling error. 9.0.0.0/8 was anomalously high too. Then, I did a copy and paste from: http://bgp.potaroo.net/cidr/reserved-ipv4.html to give some details about each /8. 11:06 001 11:04 002 11:51 003 11:49 004 11:06 005 11:08 006 11:00 007 11:49 008 11:06 009 02:22 010 11:07 011 11:07 012 11:09 013 11:05 014 11:52 015 11:52 016 11:38 017 11:46 018 11:04 019 11:18 020 11:06 021 11:05 022 11:07 023 11:31 024 11:10 025 11:05 026 11:03 027 11:12 028 11:07 029 11:10 030 11:07 031 11:51 032 11:51 033 11:09 034 11:50 035 11:09 036 11:08 037 11:45 038 11:07 039 11:13 040 11:06 041 11:05 042 11:05 043 11:53 044 11:53 045 11:08 046 11:16 047 11:03 048 11:08 049 11:05 050 11:08 051 11:06 052 11:53 053 11:03 054 11:53 055 11:05 056 11:41 057 11:01 058 10:13 059 10:51 060 10:09 061 10:38 062 10:38 063 10:10 064 10:41 065 10:22 066 10:59 067 11:11 068 11:03 069 11:21 070 11:42 071 11:12 072 11:47 073 11:09 074 11:36 075 11:16 076 11:06 077 11:04 078 11:09 079 10:45 080 10:45 081 11:03 082 11:10 083 11:26 084 10:54 085 11:12 086 10:52 087 11:16 088 10:25 089 11:00 090 10:21 091 11:12 092 11:08 093 11:09 094 11:07 095 11:08 096 11:09 097 11:10 098 11:07 099 11:04 100 11:13 101 11:06 102 11:07 103 11:06 104 11:11 105 11:11 106 11:11 107 11:09 108 11:07 109 11:09 110 11:06 111 11:10 112 11:10 113 11:11 114 11:04 115 11:13 116 11:12 117 11:06 118 11:06 119 11:08 120 11:13 121 11:12 122 10:20 123 11:02 124 10:45 125 11:48 126 11:56 127 11:18 128 10:52 129 11:03 130 11:20 131 11:18 132 10:32 133 10:52 134 11:27 135 11:02 136 11:02 137 10:48 138 10:50 139 10:53 140 10:45 141 11:00 142 11:04 143 11:17 144 11:19 145 10:44 146 10:58 147 10:08 148 10:44 149 10:32 150 09:59 151 11:14 152 11:01 153 11:15 154 11:05 155 11:06 156 10:35 157 10:55 158 10:24 159 10:53 160 10:50 161 10:41 162 10:50 163 11:12 164 10:45 165 10:32 166 10:33 167 10:32 168 10:49 169 10:50 170 11:12 171 11:23 172 11:10 173 11:08 174 11:11 175 11:10 176 11:08 177 11:10 178 11:07 179 11:12 180 11:12 181 11:12 182 11:10 183 11:12 184 11:11 185 11:11 186 11:10 187 11:16 188 11:16 189 11:00 190 11:11 191 11:00 192 10:32 193 10:25 194 10:20 195 10:59 196 11:11 197 10:56 198 11:04 199 09:46 200 10:57 201 09:52 202 10:04 203 10:48 204 10:53 205 10:05 206 10:32 207 09:23 208 10:20 209 09:56 210 10:05 211 09:51 212 10:19 213 11:58 214 11:30 215 10:10 216 10:28 217 10:48 218 11:18 219 10:56 220 11:21 221 10:33 222 11:12 223